Sunday, 15 February 2015

Manufacturing Terrorism- (Dissecting the face behind the guns)

Source: Google



White Hat- Facts and Figures
By- Namit Hans

Terrorism has been a major problem since long time. From common populace to the governments, everybody is talking about the ways to counter this problem. Every day we see newspapers covering one or the other terrorist attack in any part of the world. The attacks by Boko Haram in Nigeria and killings of journalists by ISIS are some of the latest issues of concern.

However, the controversy related to maligning a particular community and incognito powers who fund and encourage such acts are always a topic of debate. The perception that particular religion or countries are giving birth to terrorism is getting stronger. What is the reality and what is propaganda?

According to the Global Terrorism Database “terrorist attacks reached their twentieth century zenith in 1992 (with over 5,100 attacks worldwide), but had substantially declined in the years leading up to the 9/11 attacks. In fact, total attacks in 2000 (1,351) were at about the same level as total attacks in 1977 (1,307). Looking more broadly at overall trends, worldwide terrorist attacks through the mid-1970s were relatively infrequent, with fewer than 1,000 incidents each year.”

According to the same source, the top five terrorist organisations are Shining Path, Basque Fatherland and Freedom, Farabundo Marti National Liberation Fund, Irish Republican Army, Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia according to the frequency of attacks by them. Liberation Tigers of Talim Eelam (LTTE) comes eighth in the list with Taliban at thirteenth. However, LTTE comes at second and Al qaeda at third according to the number of fatalities.

The countries which suffer with such attacks most frequently are Combodia, Peru, El Salvador, India and Northern Ireland respectively. United States comes at twentieth position according to the frequency of attacks. But if we talk about the number of fatalities Iraq tops the list with Sri Lanka at the second position, followed by India and US comes at fifteenth position.

With the increase of terror attacks and the acts of killing in the name of counter terrorist, the world is being pushed into a war like situation. Who or what is actually responsible for it?


Yellow Hat- Optimism/Support
By- Ayaz Farooqi

What defines who is a terrorist and who is not?
Menachem Begin, the leader of the Jewish terrorist group Hagana, went on to become Prime Minister of Israel and received the Nobel Prize for peace. Contrary to this, Nelson Mandela while fighting the apartheid government was labeled as a terrorist and imprisoned for 25 years. So the equation is simple, whosoever is in the power, whatever label he gives, it gets stuck.

The terrorist organizations are designed to serve political and economic interests of states. The major recruiter of terrorists for the purpose of creating global hegemony happens to be the US. The US has a long history of supporting terrorists and using terror tactics. It was US who created Al Qaida and supported Osama in 1970s to fight the USSR.  As Naom Chomsky says “The U.S. is the world's leading terrorist state, and proud of it.”
The ISIS is its latest weapon that, much like Al Qaeda, is certainly backfiring. US is using ISIS in three ways: to attack its enemies in the Middle East, to serve as a pretext for U.S. military intervention abroad, and at home to foment a manufactured domestic threat, used to justify the unprecedented expansion of invasive domestic surveillance. Terrorism has become an excuse to justify mass surveillance, in preparation for mass revolt. 

Religion has never been the unique instigator of violence.  Avid followers and enemies of religions have acted throughout history in similarly brutal ways. Stalin guillotined hundreds of thousands of people, so did Hitler. According to FBI database among all the terrorists attacks committed on US soil from 1980 to 2005, the Latino extremists carried 42% terrorist attacks, Extreme left wing groups had hands in 24% terrorist attack whereas Islamic extremists are alleged to have conducted 6% of the total attacks. In Asia, The LTTE, one of the most notorious terrorist groups, has conducted hundreds of terrorist attacks. The IRA is another such example, they rein terror in UK. The list is endless where people get the motivation of spreading terror for sources other than religion.

This has been the policy of the west, specially the US to spread fear of religious extremism through the Media, among the nations as an excuse to fulfil their political and economic motives.


Black Hat- Criticism
By- Bhaswar Kumar

Aren’t terrorists simply tools in the hands of greater powers who use them to further their own goals? In today’s world there are many who pose this question so as to deflect the guilt from organizations and men who have butchered men and women alike under the pretext of some cause or the other.

Beyond the narrative and the counter-narrative lies the fact that these men, the likes of Osama and Kone, have taken the lives of thousands with little remorse in the pursuit of their own ideological or political goals. It is a fact of record that terrorists receive financial aid, weapons and training from interested parties. It is also true that often such organizations are used, with their consent or unwittingly, to further the geopolitical goals of nations and blocks. The Taliban is an example which illustrates this, the lynching, the targeted killing of the Hazaras and the draconian rules which the Taliban brought to the land were not executed under some American scheme. America was responsible for creating an environment which aided the Taliban but the greater blame lies on Mullah Omar who decided to exploit the environment to cease power through force.

This notion that terrorism is simply manufactured by world powers, in some clandestine factory and with the aim of enacting some sinister conspiracy ignores the fact that the roots of terrorism lie in intolerance and the willingness of many to use violence as a means towards their ends. The attempt to remove the religious factor from the actions of terrorists ignores the truth that stares us in the face. It is not the politics of a cause which manufactures the terrorist, most often it is the willingness to use violence supported by religious justification which makes the terrorist what he is. The youth who attacked Charlie Hebdo’s office were confidant in their belief that they were defending their faith and carrying out their religious duty, so were the perpetrators of 26/11.

We must open our eyes and realize that while geopolitics and the attraction of tools such as non-state actors do contribute in the spread of terrorist organizations, at the end of the day the ideology that drives them and the people who pull the trigger are products of these very organizations rather than being Indian, American or Israeli agents.



Green Hat- Creative Solution
By- Vibha Maru

If you go through the list of major terror attacks on Wikipedia the page seems to be a never ending one, and so are the casualties in it, incalculable people lost their lives in terrorist attack in the year 2014. Terrorism has innumerable faces in forms like Al-Qaeda. LTTE, RTE and even NDFB for that matter, they all share objectives oblivion in it self’s.

International politics seems like a bloody game of rugby where supreme powers like NATO use force to prevent ball from being dropped in their court, and when they confront each other it’s the ball that is squeezed under the human beehive. The BALL represents the world. If a common person goes through all those diction articles he might be able to understand that the well suited- mannered people, warming their comfortable seats in a secured environment are responsible for making the 3rd world what it is today.  

State sponsored terrorism must be regulated immediately; you cannot start a fire and expect it not to reach your states. There are 60 nations affected by terrorism today, still we see no unity in them. It was out in front that USA funded Al Queida but it never entered the genre of debates and discussions. Countries must differentiate their ideologies with their counterparts, US invasion killed 500000 people because they believed that Afghanistan was responsible for 9/11 attack, this marks no difference between them.

There is need for nations to understand the cost of proxy war fairness; underground or open, a war is a war, human lives are slaughtered both ways. The 4th estate on the other hand should be very cautious regarding its conduct in this fragile matter, being the primary source of information for common man, they must research and display pure facts rather than targeting a particular community.
Peace at ground level is also mandatory in order to do that mass awareness is imperative, so that youth share the liberty to make up their mind and not just be triggered as a pawn.


Blue Hat- Expert Interview
By- Ayaz Farooqi/Namit Hans

Abu Yahya Mansoor Danish, 8 year experience in Finance sector, member of advisory board Al-Iman Education Foundation, Delhi

Q1) Do you think religion is the supreme cause of terrorism? If not, then why do people have this belief?
Ans) It wrong to say that religion is a reason of terrorism. We had Virappan in India and there are Maoists, Ulfa, naxals etc. who do not have any religious reason of doing it. The same is happening on international level where terrorism is spread because of economic reasons where nations are attacking other nations. Rather, terrorism is a personal agenda where an individual is not able to convince people in a right way, therefore him or her adopts the wrong ways and starts terrorizing people.

Q2) There are certain conspiracy theories related to terrorism. Do you think these theories contain any truth or evidence?
Ans) Personally I am not for the conspiracy theories. These are good to sell on internet and it is a good means for several news channels to grow popular. If there are genuine evidences and proofs then it should be shared with the people. If the countries possess any information regarding such acts then they should share it openly with the public.

Q3) What are the urgent steps required to make people aware about all sides of this issue?
Ans) First of all, whenever something like this happens, people belonging to a particular religion (Islam) are expected to clarify their stand on the issue. This does not happen in other cases where people from other faiths are involved in it. It is foolish to blame a religion because of the act of a lunatic or a group of lunatics. The first step which is needed is that people, especially media, should start segregating terrorism with religion.

Q4) Do you think that there is media propaganda behind all of this?
Ans) Media in itself may not be doing propaganda but then the media can be used by those who are influential. However we cannot paint the entire media with the same brush and there are many media houses who are carrying out their jobs responsibly. The media should restrict itself to reporting facts. Media is one of the most powerful tools today and therefore if there is some propaganda then it shall be dealt by having more honest people in the profession.

Q5) Media relates terrorism with Islam and they have evidence of it, what do you want to say about it?
Ans) Who are the people benefiting the most when an act of terrorism happens? If you actually analyse, those who benefit the most are the ones who have economic interest. Therefore, if the media is reporting about one reason of terrorism, then they shall also concentrate on different perspectives too.


Red Hat- Public Opinion
By- Moumita Majumdar

Anubhab Sarkar,  Final semester Law student, KIIT

Q: Who according to you spreads terrorism?
A:  Psychologically, terrorism is just another term we hype up to intensify a cause. It is done by people like me and you, just with a psychologically dominated mind-set. There is a threshold for every human to stay within their human bounds. Once you cross that, the reason you cross that boundary for, becomes the sole purpose of your life. It is us, who witness ‘terrorism ‘occur and it is also us who maintain an agenda that a person with a beard is a terrorist.

Q: Is it religious fundamentalism that leads to terrorism?
A: Religious fundamentalism has at a point in time been the reason for the fail of every religion. Religious fundamentalism is a basic substitution of the word ‘fanaticism’. A religion will not permit us to kill children who go to school in order to get their 72 virgins once they die. Religions exist to make our thought processes cleaner, our beliefs stronger and our perspectives bolder.

Q: Do you think there are any hidden powers behind such organizations?
A: There are things we want to do and there are things we don’t want to do. I’m sure that depleting humanity should be the last thing that never should happen. Political agencies are known for their nexus with terrorist agencies. They are known to be state sponsored, party and belief sponsored. I don’t understand how communists can afford to hire terrorists. I’ll just leave it at that.



Srijita Bose, Student (Masters in English), Calcutta University

Q: Who according to you spreads terrorism?
A: Generally we say terrorism is spread by religious fundamentalists. It’s not always just that though. There can be political terrorism or state terrorism (what we know as rule of terror) etc. So it is hard to say who spreads terrorism. The concept of terrorism is itself controversial because it is often used by the state to legitimize their actions and maintain power. It is basically used by individuals and organizations to further their personal objectives.

Q: Is it religious fundamentalism that leads to terrorism?
A: Like I mentioned earlier, religious fundamentalism is one of the many types of terrorism. Definitely it has been creating massive havoc in our country in the late 20th and 21st century. But in a general discussion about terrorism, it is only right to include all the other forms as well.

Q: Do you think there are any hidden powers behind such organizations?
A: In case of religious fundamentalism, I don’t think the powers are hidden any longer. In fact the Talibans always claim their acts with pride. It’s a known fact that Lashkar-e-Taiba and Al Qaeda groups caused the Mumbai attack and the twin tower attacks respectively.


*******************************************************************************

Introduction:

Namit Hans, 23, Graduate in Economics from Delhi University, Former Gandhi Fellow at Piramal Foundation for Education Leadership, Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Bhaswar Kumar, 23, Graduate in English literature from Delhi University, Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Mohd. Ayaz Farooqui, 24, Graduation in computer application from Institute of management studies Ghaziabad, Worked for YES Roorkee,  Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Vibha Maru, 21, Graduate in B.Com (Hons.) from Rajasthan university, Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Moumita Majumdar, 22, Graduate in English literature from Calcutta University, Worked with Red Chillies Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Like us on facebook Click Here

Saturday, 7 February 2015

Delhi Elections 2015- (Dissecting the Opportunistic Politics)

Source: Google


White Hat- Facts and Figures
By- Sanjay Kumar Bissoyi

The national capital election is always important for several reasons. 2013 assembly elections, when Aam Aadmi Party led by Arvind Kejriwal, a creation of Anna Hazare’s anti-corruption movement, trounced Congress; Sheila Dikshit herself was defeated by Kejriwal from New Delhi Assembly constituency.

Arvind Kejriwal formed the government with support of Congress; although he resigned within 49 days as he could not pass the Jan Lokpal Bill he had promised to the electorate. Kejriwal resigned on 14 February 2014 and since then the state is under President’s rule. Delhi Election got over on 7th February and now we are waiting for Result which will be announced on 10th.

BJP named former IPS officer Kiran Bedi as its CM candidate for upcoming Assembly elections. Equated to 2013’s three cornered Congress-BJP-AAP fight, this time fight is between BJP and AAP. BJP is now trying to run the show by producing a once Anna Hazare’s crusader on the dais against Kejriwal.

The Association for Democratic Reform data shows that 673 candidates from over 70 parties are contesting the election for 70 constituencies in Delhi. 230 (34 per cent) out of 673 candidates are crorepatis. 114 (17 per cent) out of 673 candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves. During the previous Delhi Assembly elections in 2013, out of 796 candidates analyzed, 130 (16 per cent) candidates had declared criminal cases against themselves. According Opinion Poll Result conducted by various news channels shows that AAP will emerge as victorious where 67 percent of voters’ turnout recorded. The Data also shows that the number of crorepati candidates has catapulted in AAP and BJP tops the list of candidates with most number of criminal cases against them.

Delhi has seen the governance of BJP that changed three CMs in its five year term and it also saw an AAP government of 49 days. Delhi has also seen a Congress CM that governed for three successive terms. Delhi voters now have decided who to choose; do they want stability and sustained good governance in their state or the empty rhetorical promises and opportunistic politics?


Yellow Hat- Optimism/Support
By- Saloni Saini

In the present scenario, the political setup of the national capital has been molded in such a manner that it lays great scope for political opportunism. But people often confound between opportunism and cynicism. Being a political opportunist is nothing but availing the opportunities that come in one’s way, without causing any societal harm.

BJP being the most powerful political party in the country at the moment couldn’t find an appropriate Delhi CM candidate. Thus they ‘parachuted’ Kiran Bedi, which was later termed as ‘gross political opportunism’ by Congress and ‘iconic political somersault and opportunism’ by AAP. In this case, BJP used Bedi’s immaculate image for projecting her as an ideal CM candidate, whereas the ever reluctant Kiran Bedi used this as a chance to enter politics with her most favored party. Furthermore, Barack Obama’s presence on Republic Day served as an election campaign opportunity for the saffron party. Hence, all parties tend to cash upon the opportunities that come in their way.

Former AAP member who recently went on to join BJP, Shazia Ilmi also held Kejriwal as being an opportunist. If for Kejriwal joining politics by means of forming AAP was opportunism, then Ilmi switching from AAP to the saffron party can also be dubbed as mere opportunism.

Several Congress members like Alka Lamba, Arvinder Singh Lovely (son of Congress leader Buta Singh) went on to swap parties in a quest for better political prospect. Individual candidates switch from one party to another; people from distinct professions join politics at the cost of their existing professions because this gives them a superior political chance.

There is nothing subpar in seizing the opportunities that come in one’s way. Rather opportunistic politics not only breaks the monopoly of the dominant political parties, it also provides the voters an array of options to choose from.



Black Hat- Criticism
By- Saba Fatmi

This phenomena of opportunism is not new in politics, it has been availed by politicos to gross their whims and wishes since ages and hoodwinking the masses. Currently the state of affairs hovering around the Delhi elections manifests “new age opportunism”. Every single party is fooling around analogously but claims to be poles apart from the other.

The deceitful attempts pursued by all the parties are in the fore, be it BJP, AAP or Congress; all are sailing on the same boat. From the very onset of their career, both Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi have been despising the arena of politics but as we know now they both are battling neck to neck for the same spot. We can very much say that India against Corruption movement of 2013 was the podium for many aspiring politicians to fulfill their desires and camouflaging it behind the welfare of the people.

The instances of switching off from one party to another also depict the very act of opportunism; wherever lion’s share is available they instantaneously get lured by it. Initially Kiran Bedi used to be a great critique of Narendra Modi and presently she can sing praises for him. She refused the offer from AAP to be a CM candidate for 2013 Delhi elections but accepted BJP’s proposal currently, what does this imply?

Arvind Kejriwal also showed erratic conduct within the span of his 49 days tenure as Delhi CM but committed a blunder by resigning from the post to stir his political career on the national platform of the general elections of 2014.

Apparently media acts as propagandist and fosters these politicos in proliferating their aspirations by duping the masses. But imperatively one thing should be kept clear-cut by these politicians in their brains that “masses are not asses” and the tables are turning around, public are becoming more aware and reciprocating to these beguiling deeds.



Green Hat- Creative Solutions
By- Erick Massey

The term opportunist, if labeled against a person may make or mar the credibility and potential in the virtual frame. It then enhances the chimera related to that individual which is not justified as the flow of thoughts and opinions is such that it emanates in a jiffy, so the reaction time is negligible to handle the little known ‘absolute’. So, there should be caution against certain words like ‘handle with care’ as a little misuse of that could then result in an epoch of uncertainties.

However, there is no denying the fact that there have been many opportunists collaborating, breaking bonds and reuniting here and there for personal gain.

So, sensible selection of candidates should be made keeping aside the face value and permanent selection for temporary gains for example, inclusion of Kiran Bedi against Kejriwal.

Opportunism is healthy if the intention favors the welfare of public, which we have seen under certain cases however that becomes tainted if a person exercises self-centered practices neglecting the latter.

So, equal balance should be made as the political ‘sand’ entraps the actual vision.
Hence, the media and people should make a sensible approach too in order to avoid over-hyping certain personalities as it becomes a catalyst for them to proceed. Instead, they should be welcomed with healthy criticism to prove their worth.

Delhi election is crucial and should be observed with vigilance. Yet another chance for a change which was observed erstwhile too and this can mark a healthy and strict response towards opportunists.



Blue Hat- Expert Interview
By- Srivatsan Nadadhur



Sanoj Gautam, Asst. Producer in NDTV, IT head of Patparganj BJP (Delhi)


Q.) What are your thoughts about the opportunists in today’s political scenario in Delhi?
Ans)  Opportunists will not be able to bell the cats because voters in Delhi are aware and they will certainly send them in a tight corner. For example, BJP will suffer a lot because of its parachute candidates like Vinod Kumar Binny.

Q.) Do you think that political parties have a role in vacating places for personal gains?
Ans) If any political party is doing it for development and growth than there is no harm in going for personal gains. It is a huge challenge to run any political party and no party can be always right.

Q.) Do you think it is all about Give and Take politics or there is more to it?
Ans) Giving and taking is a universal thing and I take it positively. In hung assembly, outcome is always negative so it is better to opt for alliance.

Q.) How this infusion of opportunistic politics is going to affect the people?
Ans) It has a negative impact on people. They don’t consider them as reliable and stable. They understand that opportunists aim at doing money business and most of the time they fail to deliver. However, I personally believe that the word opportunist is positive. If you get an opportunity, won’t you jump to grab it?



Red Hat- Public Opinion
By- Ankit Chatterjee

Vasu goel, student (BVP)

Q.)What do you have to say on the recent trend of opportunistic politics?
Ans) Opportunistic politics is the new dark phase of Indian politics. Opportunists, who don’t even know the real meaning of politics, try to govern over a state or a country. They just use their face value to bank in votes and major political parties use them as a mascot. We don’t even know with these people are eligible for such posts or not.

Q.)Is it generated by political parties or political ambitions of a person?
Ans) It is definitely created by the political ambitions of a person. Money, fame, post, retirement and career; they get everything.

Q.)What positive points can be gathered from that?
Ans) Positive thing about this trend is that people are getting options about the leaders they have to elect. Major parties are now corrupt and it gives an opportunity to new ambitious leaders to jump in and bring up the change.


Yogesh kumar, student (Delhi University)

Q.)What do you have to say on the recent trend of opportunistic politics?
Ans) This is not just a trend but mere a strategy from each party or an opportunist candidate.
This new 'trend' is intense and increasing every day. Delhi being at the centre has witnessed it in recent elections.

Q.)Does it always lead to a wrong candidate in power?
Ans) Not always, there have been some changes in the system in recent times. It has happened in Delhi too where some ambitious politicians came forward by using a few opportunities.

Q.)How does Delhi become a base for all such activities?
Ans) Well it is the centre to all the political activities so it is more intense in Delhi and a few other places too. The importance of Delhi is such that each party try to make its impact in any manner.




*********************************************************************************************
Introduction

Sanjay Kumar Bissoyi, 22, Graduate in Sociology from Behrampur University, Pursuing Diploma in Odiya Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Saloni Saini, 23, Graduate in Mass Communication from GGSIP University Delhi, Former intern at Indo-Asian news Service and ABP news, Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Saba Fatmi, 22, Graduate in Economics from Jamia Milia Islamia Delhi, Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Erick Massey, 23, Graduate in B.Sc from Delhi University, Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Srivathsan Nadadhur, 23, Graduate in CSE from SNIST, Current film critic for CineGoer.com, Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal

Ankit Chatterjee, 22, Graduate in Journalism and Mass Communication from Amity University, Former Journalist at tadpoles.in, Pursuing Diploma in English Journalism from Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal


Like us on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Nishpaqsh/466230496850557?ref=aymt_homepage_panel

Follow us on twitter: https://twitter.com/nishpaqsh